🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue worked, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the US government. He claimed Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet permit the global atomic watchdog to visit struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Path

Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries employed their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated three times they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iranian officials said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if discussions reopen.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to resume discussions, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving clear proposals from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He said the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith difficult to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently sought to dictate their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and continues the final resolution to settle disputes, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the wake of this attack."